Legal Opinion

Sedlacek v. Hillis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2001No. 70254-3PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

The respondent, Diane Sedlacek, a nondisabled person, claims that she was wrongfully discharged from her position as a member of a husband-wife *382apartment management team because of her association with her disabled husband. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (1994), prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against able-bodied persons who are associated with or related to disabled persons. Washington law does not. We are asked to decide whether federal law provides a clear mandate of public policy on which a nondisabled…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hubbard v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Viking Properties, Inc. v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API