Sedlacek v. Hillis
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.
The respondent, Diane Sedlacek, a nondisabled person, claims that she was wrongfully discharged from her position as a member of a husband-wife *382apartment management team because of her association with her disabled husband. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (1994), prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against able-bodied persons who are associated with or related to disabled persons. Washington law does not. We are asked to decide whether federal law provides a clear mandate of public policy on which a nondisabled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Hale v. Wellpinit School Dist. No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Hubbard v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Hale v. Wellpinit School District No. 49Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Viking Properties, Inc. v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.