Legal Opinion

In re L.A.B.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. Nos. 2007-0895 and 2007-0912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether Juv.R. 29 applies to probation revocation hearings in juvenile courts. We hold that it does. We also hold that the totality-of-the-circumstances test established in In re C.S., 115 Ohio St.3d 267, 2007-Ohio-4919, 874 N.E.2d 1177, ¶ 108, applies to determine whether a valid waiver of counsel has been made by a juvenile.

*113I. Case Background

{¶ 2} In August 2005, appellant L.A.B., then 13, was found delinquent by the Juvenile Division of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas for entering an enclosed porch and stealing a minibike. He was placed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re L.A.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re L.A.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. In re S.N.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. In re C.J.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In re D.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API