Legal Opinion

In re C.J.B.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2009No. 2008-2278Published

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re L.A.B., 121 Ohio St.3d 112, 2009-Ohio-354, 902 N.E.2d 471, to the extent the court of appeals held that Juv.R. 29 does not apply to probation revocation hearings. The cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re L.A.B.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re L.A.B.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009