In re D.S.
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 2} I dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss this appeal as having been improvidently accepted. The state’s proposition of law presents a substantial question regarding the effect of a juvenile’s failure to provide discovery on the calculation of speedy-trial time. I would address the merits of the appeal and hold that the statutory speedy-trial time is tolled when a juvenile prosecuted as a serious youthful offender (“SYO”) fails to respond to the state’s request for discovery. Accordingly, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the juvenile…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.