Legal Opinion
Wegefarth v. Weissner
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 25, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Heuisler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This appeal is by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Baltimore City Court in favor of the defendants for costs, and the appellees have filed in this Court a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the bills of exceptions were not presented to them or signed by the judge within the time allowed by the Act of 1916, Chapter 625. .
The Act referred to is as follows:
“Section 1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Maryland, That Section 173 of the Acts of 1886, Chapter'184, codified in the revised Charter of Baltimore City as section 316, be and the same is hereby repealed and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. StricklingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Hoppe v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Carter v. Maryland & Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Gottlieb v. Fred. W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- State v. Emerson & Morgan Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Christian v. Johnson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
- Middendorf, Williams & Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Wegefarth v. WiessnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.