Labish v. Hardy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
Action to quiet title. The material question in this case is, whether the plaintiff has any title to the premises described in her complaint.
The facts upon which appellant relies as proving her title to the premises are stated in the brief of her counsel to be as follows: “In 1847 plaintiff’s parents went into possession of the land in dispute, which was then public land of the United States, and continued to occupy it, together with their children, as their home until the death of plaintiff’s mother, which occurred in June, 1856, at which time plaintiff was seven years old. After the death…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kubli v. HawkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Baker v. BrickellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Forker v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- McCune v. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Town of Red Bluff v. Walbridge.California Court of Appeal · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.