Town of Red Bluff v. Walbridge.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County, and from an order denying a new trial. John F. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to have an encroachment upon a certain street in the town of Red Bluff, Tehama county, declared to be a public nuisance and an unlawful obstruction, and to have the same removed. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
It is averred in the complaint that Washington street, running north and south, in said town has a uniform width of eighty feet through its entire length, is now and for many years last past has continuously been one of the regularly and legally established and existing public streets and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Eversdon v. MayhewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Meier v. Portland Cable Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Pacific Railway Co. v. Alameda CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ball v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Wilkenson v. Dept. of Interior of United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Hays v. VanekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. SuitorTexas Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.