Legal Opinion

McCune v. Essig

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1903No. 924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the District of Washington.

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

William McCune and his wife settled upon a quarter section of land in Lincoln county, Wash., under the homestead law of the United States, and on April 4, 1884, he filed, in the proper district land office, a claim to said land as a homestead. In the same year he died intestate, his widow, Sarah McCune, and his daughter, the appellant herein, surviving him. On December 17, 1889, Sarah McCune, then Sarah Donahue, made proof in the land office of full compliance with the requirements of the homestead law, and on March 6,1891, a patent was issued to her therefor, granting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Bernier v. BernierSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gray v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Council Improvement Co. v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Cunningham v. KrutzWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Eckert v. SchmittWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. White v. MayoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API