Legal Opinion

State v. DeSantiago

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 1999No. 17499-9-IIIPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

In State v. Ladson 1 our Supreme Court held that a police officer’s subjective motive for a traffic stop, in addition to the reasonableness of the officer’s behavior, determines the constitutional propriety of the stop. Here, a Pasco police officer suspected that Armando DeSantiago had just bought or sold drugs. But the officer did not have probable cause to stop him for the drug transaction. So he followed Mr. DeSantiago looking for a reason to stop him. After following him for about 10 blocks, the officer stopped Mr. DeSantiago for a traffic violation. Mr. DeSantiago had an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City of Seattle v. MesianiWashington Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State v. Minh HoangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API