People v. Remus
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Van-Burén; Carr, J. William Remus and William J. Remus were convicted. of a violation of the local option law.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
The information in this case, except in the names of persons and dates of events, is precisely like that adjudged to be sufficient in Anderson v. Van Buren Circuit Judge, 130 Mich. 697 (90 N. W. 692), and charged respondents with keeping a drug store for the unlawful sales of liquor. No testimony was introduced by respondents, and the testimony of the people tended strongly to prove their guilt. The issue was submitted to the jury, who, after being out all night, reported to the court the following morning that they were unable to agree. Thereupon the court said:
“Gentlemen of the jury, it is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. CollisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Anderson v. Van Buren Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Maynard v. Eaton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MaguireIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. HeikkalaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.