Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Van Buren Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1902No. Calendar No. 19,216PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus by David Anderson, prosecuting attorney of Van Burén county, to compel John R. Carr, circuit judge of said county, to vacate an order quashing an information.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The defendant was charged with a violation of the liquor law. The following is a copy of the substance of the information:

“At the township of South Haven, and in the county aforesaid, and on divers days and times between that day and the 17th day of October, A. D. 1901, in a certain building there situate, did then and there keep a certain place, to wit, a drug-store, where vinous, malt, brewed, fermented, spirituous, and intoxicating liquors, and mixed liquors and beverages a part of which were intoxicating, were sold, stored for sale, given away, and furnished, he, the said Jesse E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bishopp v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Maynard v. Eaton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. UtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Maynard v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donovan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Yazel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. RemusMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. CongdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. EdelsohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API