Legal Opinion

People v. Warren

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1899PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Rapids; Newnham, J. Frank D. Warren was convicted of embezzlement

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The respondent was city clerk of Grand Rapids. He was charged with appropriating to his own use money belonging to the city. The case was tried before a jury. The trial judge charged the jury at length. Near the close of the charge he instructed the jury that it was their duty to return a verdict of guilty. The jury retired with an officer, and, after being out for three hours, they were brought into court, and the following occurred:

“The Court: Mr. Clerk, you may ask the jury if they have arrived at a verdict.
“The Clerk: Gentlemen of the jury, have you arrived *506at your verdict? If so, let…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. People v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gibbons v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API