Legal Opinion

State v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 2009No. CR020009A; A120233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, which vacated our prior decision, State v. Heath, 201 Or App 92, 116 P3d 930 (2005) (.Heath I), in light of State v. Ramirez, 343 Or 505, 173 P3d 817 (2007), adh’d to as modified on recons, 344 Or 195, 179 P3d 673 (2008), and State v. Fults, 343 Or 515, 173 P3d 822 (2007). State v. Heath, 345 Or 315, 195 P3d 63 (2008). In Heath I, we vacated defendant’s sentences and remanded for resentencing because the trial court had imposed departure sentences based on judicial findings that defendant was persistently involved in similar offenses.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. HeathOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KnightonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API