Legal Opinion

State v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 2005No. CR02-0009A; A120233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his conviction on one count of assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175, and his upward departure sentences on two counts of criminal mistreatment in the first degree, ORS 163.205, based on the sentencing court’s findings that defendant knew or had reason to know of the victim’s particular vulnerability and that the offense involved a violation of public trust or professional responsibility. We reject without discussion defendant’s challenge to his conviction. Defendant argues that the imposition of departure sentences violated the rule of law announced in Blakely v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API