Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Weiner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We have examined the record of the testimony taken at the hearing before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and the exhibits presented by both relator and respondent. After a careful analysis of such evidence as to each count passed upon by the board, this court agrees that the record amply supports the findings of the board that respondent has violated the provisions of Canon 1, DR 1-102(A) (5); Canon 2, DR 2-106 (A); Canon 2, DR 2-110(A)(2); and Canon 9, DR 9-102, and that, therefore, respondent is guilty of misconduct as defined in Gov. R. V(5)(b).
We affirm the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Crawford v. LoganTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re WeinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- In Re WeinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. TuttleOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re WeinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.