Crawford v. Logan
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
We granted Plaintiff’s Rule 11 application because the issue raised on appeal has not been addressed by this Court. Suit was brought by an attorney against his former client to recover attorney fees for services rendered on the client’s behalf in a divorce proceeding. The question of law presented is whether the violation by counsel of a disciplinary rule of this Court warrants the forfeiture of counsel’s claim for a fee, if the violation prejudiced his client’s divorce action?
Before deciding the legal issue, two factual issues must necessarily be addressed: (1)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Rice v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- John C. Frank, Plaintiff-Cross v. Victoria BloomCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Ross v. ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Chambliss, Bahner and Crawford v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Arce v. Burrow, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Saffer v. WilloughbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Gilchrist v. PerlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.