Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Weiner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 14, 1977No. 58923Published

1DissentFinch, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I cannot concur in the conclusion reached in the principal opinion that respondent did not conduct himself improperly with respect to the $480 which had been deposited with him in trust for use for a specific purpose and that he should not be disciplined by this court.

As noted in the principal opinion, respondent was suspended for an indefinite period in Ohio on the basis that he was guilty of misconduct which violated Canon 1, DR 1—102(A)(5), Canon 2, DR 2-106(A), Canon 2, DR 2-110(A)(2) and Canon 9, DR 9—102. Dayton Bar Association v. Weiner, 40 Ohio St.2d 7, 69 Ohio…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re WeinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. WeinerOhio Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API