Legal Opinion
In Re Weiner
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 8, 1975No. 58923PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEILER, Chief Justice.
This case presents the question of how far must or should we go in disciplining a Missouri lawyer who has been suspended in another state.1 The present disciplinary proceeding is based on our rule 5.19 which provides, in substance, that where a Missouri attorney has been adjudged guilty of professional misconduct in another jurisdiction, an order shall be served to show cause why said adjudication should not be conclusive of said misconduct for the purpose of discipline by this court. On October 16, 1974, the supreme court of Ohio entered an order suspending respondent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re VeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- The Florida Bar v. WilkesSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- State v. WeinerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- In re KimballNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. WeinerOhio Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re CaranchiniSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Chairman of Board of Trustees v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- In Re StormentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Tandon v. State Board of MedicineCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- In Re WeinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.