Legal Opinion
United States v. Warne
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 29, 1960No. 39030, 39073PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEIGERT, District Judge.
I
Background of the Case.
The above two actions have been brought by the United States to determine the applicability of the California Milk Stabilization Law (Cal.Agricultural Code, Div. 6, Ch. 17, Secs. 4200 to 4420) to purchases made by the United States, through U. S. Army and Air Force procurement officers, of milk and milk products from local producers and distributors for on-base mess hall consumption and on-base commissary sales at three federal military installations located within the territorial limits of California.
Civil Action No. 39030, involving the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- King v. Gemini Food Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1976
- Coso Energy Developers v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Paul v. Allied Dairymen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.