Knippel v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank

The questions presented are: (1) Whether the antenuptial agreement must be disregarded because it is in conflict with the law of Arizona; (2) whether the agreement is to be set aside because Mr. Knippel did not make a full and frank disclosure of his worth; (3) whether the evidence compels the county court to find that the execution of the agreement was obtained by fraud. We conclude that all the questions are to be answered in the negative and that the judgment of the county court is to be affirmed.(1) Validity of the agreement. Sec. 25-201, 9 Arizona R. S. Anno., provides in part: “A.…