Freeman v. Rinkel
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
Quaere: Can an elective adoption workman under the workmen’s compensation act, injured in the course of his employment, maintain a common-law action for negligence against a defendant who, at the time of the injury, is an employer under the act and is engaged in extrahazardous employment as defined by the act?
Answer: The elective adoption workman cannot maintain such an action.
Facts Which Raise The Issue: C. E. Freeman, office manager of W. P. Fuller & Co., who came under the workmen’s compensation act by virtue of the elective adoption section, was driving an automobile in the course of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Denning v. QuistWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Koreski v. Seattle Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Weiffenbach v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bice v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1958