Legal Opinion

Weiffenbach v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1938No. 26968. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant city to recover damages on account of severe injuries sustained by him through the city’s negligence. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. The material facts may be epitomized as follows:

The plaintiff was employed by the Seattle Cornice Works in making estimates and surveys of buildings for repair. While engaged in measuring the roof of a building, he was permanently injured by a current of electricity conveyed by a metal tape measure used by him from a high voltage wire, part of the city’s municipal light and power system. The wire was carried on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Denning v. QuistWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gephart v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Koreski v. Seattle Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Michael Weaver v. City Of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API