Legal Opinion

Bice v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1958No. 34258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

March 7, 1956, Forrest D. Bice, a self-employed junk dealer, was injured when a truck driven by Hugh Maffei (an employee of P. K. Anderson & Sons, a construction company) collided with his truck.

Bice commenced this action to recover for his personal injuries and property damage, alleging that Maffei was negligent in failing to yield the right of way. Defendants’ answer denied the allegations and alleged, as an affirmative defense, that all parties involved in the accident were covered by the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act, and that the immunity proviso of RCW 51.24.010 [cf. Rem.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lunz v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Morris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Purinton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Arden Farms Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nelson v. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Ackley-Bell v. Seattle School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Dependents of Pacheco v. Orchids of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Dependents of Pacheco v. Orchids of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API