Legal Opinion
Robinson v. McHugh
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1930No. 22300. Department TwoPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.
The appellant, an employee of the city of Tacoma working in the light department, was injured the 19th day of April, 1929, and elected to sue respondents, claiming the right so to do under the workmen’s compensation act. The essential parts of the complaint material to this appeal are as follows:
“II.
‘ ‘ That on or about the 19th day of April, A. D. 1929, the defendants herein as a community were engaged in the business of managing and operating a gasoline shovel in the city of Tacoma under the name of Coast Contractors.
“III.
“That the plaintiff herein, on the said 19th day of April, 1929, at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Kowcun v. BybeeOregon Supreme Court · 1947
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.