Legal Opinion

Muldrow v. Weinstein

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1951No. 450Published

1Opinion of the Court

68 S.E.2d 249 (1951)

234 N.C. 587

MULDROW

v.

WEINSTEIN et al.

No. 450.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 12, 1951.

W. Brantley Womble, and Bickett & Banks, all of Raleigh, for plaintiff, appellee.

Ehringhaus & Ehringhaus, Raleigh, for defendants, appellants.

DEVIN, Chief Justice.

Though the plaintiff's injury was sustained in the course of his employment by the defendants, employers of more than five persons in the same business, the defendants in the manner prescribed by G.S. § 97-4 had exempted themselves from the operation of the Workmen's Compensation Act. Accordingly plaintiff instituted…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Beach v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Wood Ex Rel. Putnam v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. McGlone v. William Angus, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Lee v. Carolina Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API