Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fenley v. Ohio Historical Society

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 90-1902PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by this mandamus action is whether R.C. 149.43 requires a custodian of public records to mail copies of those records upon request. For the reasons which follow, we find that a custodian of public records has no clear legal duty under R.C. 149.43(B) to transmit copies of those records by mail, and we deny the writ.

R.C. 149.43(C) authorizes a person who allegedly is aggrieved by a governmental unit’s failure to comply with R.C. 149.43(B) to commence a mandamus action to force compliance, and also to seek reasonable attorney fees. Before a writ of mandamus will issue in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wingate v. HordgeOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Fairfield Leader v. RickettsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Margolius v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Leonard v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Nelson v. FuerstOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. DanielsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. The Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API