Legal Opinion

Allen Manufacturing Co. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 20, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The plaintiff corporation, an employer subject to the Unemployment Compensation Act, seeks to recover overpayments in its contributions to the unemployment compensation fund for the years 1950 and 1951. It claims that these over-payments were made because the defendant failed to allow certain rehiring credits which would have reduced its rates of contribution and that this constituted error which, under the law, entitles it to a refund. The defendant filed an answer in which he stated, in substance, that the failure to allow the rehiring credits was due to the fault of the plaintiff and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. H. Duys Co., Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Pitt v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. City of Norwalk v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Savings Bank of Rockville v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Division 163 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Employees of America v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. New Haven Market Exchange, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API