Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. Jelinek Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAND, A. C. J.

This is an action at law for damages to plaintiff’s automobile because of the alleged negligence of defend ants in causing a tree to fall upon it. After issue joined the case was first tried in the District Court where judgment was rendered against the defendant Gugat but for the defendants Jelinek. Thereafter the case was tried de novo by the Circuit Court without a jury, both parties having consented thereto. Judgment went for the plaintiff and against the defendants Jelinek in the sum of $342.22 and costs and they appealed.

The case comes to this court in the following…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Noland v. BullOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Farrell v. Oregon Gold Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Williams v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Larsen v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Multnomah Lumber Co. v. Toston Basket Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Sherman v. BANKUSOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Jewell v. ComptonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. MATTILA ET UX v. OlsvickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hoffee v. Salem Yellow Cab Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API