Legal Opinion

Sherman v. BANKUS

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, c. j.

The plaintiff, Arthur Eber Sherman, Jr., brought this action at law to recover from the defendant Elmer Bankus damages in the sum of $1,000, allegedly resulting from the breach by defendant of his agreement to have plaintiff survey certain premises in Brookings and to pay plaintiff the reasonable value of said services. The court tried the case without a jury and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff assigns as error (1) the refusal of the court to settle the bill of exceptions tendered by plaintiff; (2) the denial of plaintiff’s motion for new…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Williams v. RaganOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Fields v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Benson v. BirchOregon Supreme Court · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Clarizo v. Spada Distributing Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hoffee v. Salem Yellow Cab Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Clarizo v. Spada Distributing Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Clarizo v. Spada Distributing Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API