McCaleb v. Worcester
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
We are not of opinion that the court erred in overruling the motion to dismiss the bill. The statute and rule of practice authorize a revivor, on motion before the register or the court, by and in the name of the complainant’s “successor or party in interest,” without a bill of revivor. Code 1923, § 6552; Rule 101, Chancery Practice, vol. 4, Code of 1923, p. 938. (Italics supplied.)
The matter in controversy here is the title to the property, and the party in interest, within the meaning of the statute and rule of practice, was the party alleged to have the title. Sims, Ch. Pr. § 620; Rhea v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- George E. Wood Lumber Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Buchmann Abstract & Investment Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Randle v. DaughdrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Downing v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Hinds v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Ford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Webster v. TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Owen v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.