Owen v. Montgomery
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
The original bill seeks to have located and established a disputed boundary line between complainants and defendant as coterminous owners. Section 6440, Code 1923; Smith v. Cook, 220 Ala. 338, 124 So. 898; Yauger v. Taylor, 218 Ala. 235, 118 So. 271.
Complainants’ lands are specifically described in the second paragraph, and in paragraph three reference is made to a map made an exhibit, disclosing the property of the respective parties, and the true line as contended by complainants as well as the boundary line npon which defendant relies.
It is here first insisted that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Yauger v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Mink v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Baldwin v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Kyser v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baldwin v. McClendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Ingram v. Omelet Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Floyd v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Scott v. LeigeberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.