Legal Opinion

Bower v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 16, 2003No. 94-2862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING THE MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF THE EEOC, BOWER, HERDRICH, MORALES, AND WEISE

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court are motions for partial summary judgment from the following parties: Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”); Plaintiff Richard Bower (“Bower”); Plaintiffs-In-tervenors Sharon Herdrich (“Herdrich”), Luis Morales (“Morales”), and Tim Weise (“Weise”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”); and Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx” of “Defendant”). Plaintiffs assert claims…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bower v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
  2. Douglas v. EsperDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API