Legal Opinion

Bower v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided October 30, 2006No. 94-CV-2862 DIAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION AND PLAINTIFF-INTER-VENORS HERDRICH, MORALES AND WEISE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion (D.E.# 484) of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and Plaintiff-Intervenors Sharon Herdrich (“Herdrich”), Luis Morales (“Morales”), and Tim Wiese (“Wiese”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) 1 for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs filed the present action against Defendant Fed eral Express Corporation (“Defendant”) for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API