Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 2, 1960No. 36632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is the second appeal ’ from the District Court of Canadian County in this case. ' The first appeal was Arthur v. Arthur, Okl., 258 P.2d 1191. The action was commenced by Ira W. Arthur and Lizzie Kaler, co-executors of the estate of J.- E. Shirk, deceased, against Virgil M. Shaw as guardian of the person and estate of Cassie Vance, an incompetent person (who before her incompe'tency was a co-executrix of the Shirk estate), Charles S. Arthur and Anna Pearson Arthur, his wife, for an accounting of. the 'money and property belonging to the Shirk estate. Therein after the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallace v. FiskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  2. Wilson-Harris, Adm'x v. Southwest Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. District Court of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Arthur v. ArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Dean v. JelsmaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Estate of Estes v. KramerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Howell Petroleum Corp. v. Leben Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Margaret Blair Trust v. BlairCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. Barassi v. MatisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API