Legal Opinion

Barassi v. Matison

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 14, 1982No. 2 CA-CIV 3947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This is an action on a note and mortgage. The trial court, after making findings of fact and conclusions of law, ordered a foreclosure and awarded appellees $116,255.29 plus interest, costs and attorney’s fees. Based on the doctrine of res judicata and collateral estoppel, appellants contend appellees were not entitled to a judgment on the note. We do not agree.

The parties were previously before this court in Matison v. Barassi, 118 Ariz. 538, 578 P.2d 619 (1978). Briefly, the facts of that case were as follows. Barassi is an attorney; Matison is a real estate…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Taylor v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Tomiyasu v. GoldenNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Manor v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Hrudka v. HrudkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Norriega v. MacHadoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Baier v. Mayer Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API