Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1953No. 35991PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD,'Justice.

This action was commenced in the trial court by the filing of a petition by Ira W. Arthur and Lizzie Kaler, coexecutors of the-estate of J. E. Shirk, deceased, against Virgil M. Shaw, guardian of the person and estate of Cassie Vance, an incompetent person, Charles S. Arthur and Anna Pearson Arthur.

' The petition alleges that Lizzie Kaler and Ira W. Arthur are coexecutors of the estate of J. E. Shirk, deceased, appointed the 19th day of August, 1912; that Charles S. Arthur and Anna Pearson Arthur are husband and wife; that Charles S. Arthur is the nephew of Cassie Vance;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Land & Development Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Warren v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clement v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Arthur v. ArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Page v. ShermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Rowan v. RowanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API