Legal Opinion
Michigan Sugar Co. v. Jebavy-Sorenson Orchard Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 1976No. Docket 22856PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
Michigan Sugar Company instituted an action to collect several outstanding invoices for sugar that it supplied Jebavy-Sorenson Orchard Company. Jebavy-Sorenson filed a counterclaim claiming a breach of an implied warranty. MCLA 440.2314; MSA 19.2314, MCLA 440.2315; MSA 19.2315. A partial summary judgment was granted Michigan Sugar as to its claim and the matter proceeded to trial on Jebavy-Soren-son’s counterclaim. Following a bench trial the trial court granted Jebavy-Sorenson a judgment on its counterclaim. It is from this judgment that Michigan Sugar appeals as of right.
In its counterclaim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Necho Coal Co. v. Denise Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Hammond v. HanninMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Ambassador Steel Co. v. Ewald Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Hill v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Southerland v. Northeast Datsun, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
- Taylor and Gaskin, Inc. v. Chris-Craft IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Larry T. Wilson, and Cross-Appellant v. Thomas L. Beebe, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.