Legal Opinion
Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 20, 1980No. C-1440PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioners Carl and Sam Prutch (Prutch-es) were plaintiffs below. They sued for alleged breaches of express and implied warranties arising out of their purchases of a tractor, plow, disc harrow, and hay baler. The defendants in the lawsuit were the Ford Motor Company (Ford), manufacturer of all four farm implements, and its dealer, Baldridge Implement Company (Baldridge), which had sold the equipment to Prutches.
The first trial ended in a mistrial. At the conclusion of the second trial, the jury rendered a verdict for $60,200 in favor of the plaintiffs against Ford. The jury, however, held…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Blueflame Gas, Inc. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Church of the Nativity of Our Lord v. WatPro, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Colorado National Bank of Denver v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.