Young Windows, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
Certain imported window regulators, so-called, were classified by the collector of customs as articles, wholly or in chief value of metal, not specially provided for, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem as provided in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802).
Plaintiff invokes several alternative claims for a lower rate of duty than that assessed by the collector. Its primary claim is for classification in paragraph 369 (c)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Stoeger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Wedemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Gamble Vargish & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Young Windows, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956