Legal Opinion

Young Windows, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 14, 1955No. C. D. 1693PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Certain imported window regulators, so-called, were classified by the collector of customs as articles, wholly or in chief value of metal, not specially provided for, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 22% per centum ad valorem as provided in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802).

Plaintiff invokes several alternative claims for a lower rate of duty than that assessed by the collector. Its primary claim is for classification in paragraph 369 (c)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Stoeger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Wedemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Gamble Vargish & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Young Windows, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API