Legal Opinion

State v. McNeil

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 22, 1965No. File No. CR 6-27467PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

The defendant, in a trial to the court, was convicted of the crime of indecent exposure in violation of § 53-220 of the General Statutes. He has appealed from the judgment on the ground that the court erred in concluding that upon all the evidence he was guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt.

Briefly stated, the defendant’s alleged misconduct occurred on September 26, 1964, under these circumstances: The complaining witnesses, sisters, whom we shall refer to as Julia and Elizabeth, ages fourteen and twelve respectively, were walking along a dirt road, between 5:30 and 6 p.m.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. CoulombeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. State v. MendesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JaimeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  2. State v. PallmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
  3. State v. WyantConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
  4. State v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. CopelandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API