Legal Opinion

State v. Copeland

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 29, 1969No. File No. CR 5-13071Published

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

The defendant, after a trial to the court, was found guilty of breach of the peace in violation of § 53-174 of the General Statutes. He has appealed from the judgment, assigning as the sole error that the court incorrectly concluded that on all the evidence the defendant was guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. No finding was requested or made and none was necessary. Practice Book § 995. Upon such an assignment in a criminal case tried to the court, we examine the evidence filed by the appellant. This we have done. State v. Salvaggio, 152 Conn. 716, 717; State v. Pundy, 147…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  5. State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API