Legal Opinion
State v. Jaime
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 11, 1967No. File No. CR 5-10015PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The defendant having entered pleas of not guilty to charges of indecent exposure and resisting arrest in violation of § 53-220 and § 53-165, respectively, of the General Statutes, and having been found guilty on each count, has appealed. The defendant has assigned error in his conviction on each count in the denial of his motion to correct the finding, in the court’s conclusions and in the conclusion that on all the evidence he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Upon the last *531assignments we determine from the entire evidence whether the court erred in holding that guilt was established by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. Chin LungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Commonwealth v. BroadlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Noblett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moses v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. BunchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- State v. PallmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1968
- Moses v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.