Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Ulrich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1968PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a suit for strict foreclosure of a land sale contract. The purchasers, John H. Ulrich and James P. Colley, defaulted and a decree was entered allowing them sixty days within which to pay sums found by the court to be owing to the plaintiff and, if not so paid, foreclosing all their rights in the property.

The only dispute arises out of the contention of the defendant Roberta Curtis that, as assignee of the purchasers, she should be adjudged to have a lien upon the land superior to the rights of the plaintiff. From an adverse decree Mrs. Curtis appeals.

Mrs. Curtis, a realtor,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Mohr v. LearOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ward v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lovejoy v. ChapmanOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Morrison v. Kandler Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Butler v. WilkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Highway Commission v. DemarestOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rush v. AnestosIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Estate of Hutchins v. FargoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Estate of Brewer v. Iota Delta Chapter, Tau Kappa Epsilon Fraternity, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API