Legal Opinion

Hug v. Hall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 79PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to allow an appeal from the county court of said county or direct judgment to be entered therein for the defendant non obstante veredicto. .

The record of the case in the county court is not brought up: we have only the petition filed in the court of common pleas and its accompanying exhibits.

From these it appears that an action in trespass was brought in the county court by Wm. Hug and Henrietta Hug, his wife, against the appellant, W. Sheraden Hall, to recover damages resulting from an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Murtland v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Fisher v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Jordan v. EiseleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Leckstein v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Smith v. BergdollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Ehrlich v. StiefelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Smith, Jr. Et Ux. v. BlafkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API