Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bergdoll

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1931No. Appeal 159PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the court below discharging his rule to strike off certain judgments entered therein. The alleged cause of action was negligence upon the part of defendant which caused personal injuries to Maxwell Smith, the minor son of Walter R. Smith.

They began their consolidated actions in trespass on January 31, 1929, and on the same day filed their statement of claim with the prothonotary. On February 7, 1929, the sheriff returned that he had served appellant the previous day by handing copies of the writ and of the statement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leckstein v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Hug v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Murta v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. First National Bank v. CookeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Loeb v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rebic v. Gulf Refining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Wilson v. Bensalem Township School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Allegheny County v. Virgin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1957
  4. Deemer & Co. v. Kline Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1939
  5. Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. Brith Achim Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API