Ehrlich v. Stiefel

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The'se three actions in trespass were tried together. They grew out of the same accident. Verdicts were rendered in favor of the defendant as to all three minor plaintiffs, hut against him, as to theij respective parents, for the moneys expended hy them in connection with their children’s injuries. The defendant made no objection to these anomalous verdicts, hut paid the judgments entered on them in favor of the parents and had them marked ‘satisfied.’

The several minor plaintiffs then moved the lower court to grant them a new trial because of the apparently inconsistent…