Legal Opinion
Conner v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1935No. Civ. 9556Published
1Opinion of the Court
8 Cal.App.2d 613 (1935)
D. L. CONNER, Respondent,
v.
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.
Civ. No. 9556.
California Court of Appeals. First Appellate District, Division One.
August 5, 1935.
Crosby & Crosby for Appellants.
Clark, Nichols & Eltse for Respondent.
Ward, J., pro tem.
Upon the date mentioned in the complaint plaintiff was going to work and stopped on a sidewalk for a few seconds near the intersection of public streets in the city of Berkeley. Defendant East Bay Municipal Utility District, a corporation, and codefendants and employees thereof, Storer and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Maede v. Oakland High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.