Legal Opinion

Virginia Hauf v. Life Extension Foundation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2011No. 09-1938UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

Virginia Hauf, the mother of a child diagnosed with brain cancer, purchased shark cartilage supplements from the Life Extension Foundation. Several years later, Hauf contacted the Foundation and offered to endorse its products. The Foundation sent her a proposed “Testimonial” and a “Standard Release of Testimonials & Photos.” Hauf revised the proposed testimonial and returned it to the Foundation. She also signed and returned the release, which provides that Hauf grants the Foundation the “irrevocable right” to use her “name (or any fictional name)”…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Rogers v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API