Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rogers v. Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2016No. 15-3409Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClay, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority’s holding that Rogers waived his ability to bring a FOIA claim against the IRS when he signed the release at issue. I write separately, in part, because I believe the issue — one of first impression in this circuit — merits additional analysis. I also write separately to dissent from the majority’s holding that the IRS did not waive the defense of release.

I

For nearly ten years, the IRS conducted an investigation into several offshore gambling businesses owned by Rogers and two of his partners. The IRS suspected that Rogers and his partners, through their business in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Moore, Owen, Thomas & Company v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey, and L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey v. Thomas O. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API