Legal Opinion

Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 22, 2017No. Case No. 10-58583; Adv. Pro. No. 10-2508PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON REMAINING COUNTS OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

John E. Hoffman, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. Introduction

When debtors commence Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, they become debtors in possession obligated to perform most of the duties of a trustee, including the duty to object to improper claims filed against the bankruptcy estate in order to increase the recovery realized by their legitimate creditors. George Bavelis, whose confirmed Chapter 11 plan provides for a 100% repayment of his legitimate creditors’ claims, dutifully fulfilled that…

2Cases cited177 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Turner v. DeKalb Bank (In Re Turner)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  2. Frederick D. Harris and Bernice R. HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API